The rights of the accused is primarily enshrined in the Bill ofRights. While the U.S. Constitution is the main source of protectionsfor the accused, the federal government and states also put enactednumerous legislation and court rules to ensure that the accused isnot placed in undue advantage. Without putting in place protectionsfor the accused, he or she may not receive fair treatment from thegovernment, especially law enforcement agencies and prosecutors,given that these agencies have extensive resources at their disposal.Criminal defense law protects an accused prior to any filing of asuit, during trial, and after trial.

Criminal cases rely heavily on direct and circumstantial evidence bythe prosecutor. Unreasonable searches and seizures and illegalissuance of warrants are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment.Defense attorneys can easily overthrow a criminal case by arguingthat law enforcement agencies conducted the search and seizure orissued warrants for search or arrest in an unlawful manner, thusmaking the evidence unacceptable in court.

Another protection afforded to an accused is the law against doublejeopardy, enshrined in the Fifth Amendment. Double jeopardy meansthat a person who has been tried and acquitted of a crime cannot becharged with the same crime again. Defendants, under the SixthAmendment, is guaranteed of the right to a public and jury trial andthe right to confront opposing witnesses and subpoena favorablewitnesses.

There are many nuances involved in criminal defense. The foremostconsideration for criminal defense attorneys would be to make surethat their clients are treated fairly, regardless of whether theaccused admits to the wrongdoing or not. Criminal defense attorneysalso make sure they take advantage of the protections afforded totheir clients to make sure their clients continue to enjoy theirliberties. One of the first things that a criminal defense attorneyhas to do, following an arrest, is to get the accused out from jail.Criminal defense attorneys need to take their clients out from jail,prior to trial or while a trial is pending, so that the defendant canfreely assist them in their cases.

Criminal defense law allows attorneys to make plea bargains fordefendants in order to avoid lengthy trial. In a plea bargain, thedefendant pleads guilty in exchange for a lenient sentence.Defendants can achieve plea bargaining either by (i) fighting theprosecutor and making the case difficult for him or (ii) fullycooperating with the prosecutor and convincing the prosecutor that alenient sentence is appropriate.

Once a criminal case goes to trial, expert litigating techniqueshould be employed by criminal defense attorneys as it will becomedifficult to convince juries, especially if the cases are ofsensitive nature. Criminal trials are exhausting and often veryemotionally draining for all parties. A defendant cannot successfullywin his case without the help of an attorney who is not justknowledgeable of the theories of criminal defense law but who is alsopersuasive enough to convince the jury and the judge.

Criminal defense is laborious work as criminal cases are tedious. Theaccused, and later on, the criminal defendant, must always berepresented by an attorney in all steps of the criminal proceeding.In order for the accused's rights to be fully protected, one mustseek the assistance of counsel who are experts in battling shrewdprosecutors and zealous police officers. Criminal defense attorneysare not just knowledgeable of both federal and state criminal lawstatutes, they are also skillful in using criminal defense laws tothe advantage of the accused.

Each year, thousands die because of motor vehicle crashes. Caraccidents involving the collision of two cars are the most commontype of crashes, although a large percentage of fatalities in caraccidents involve motorcyclists and pedestrians. Because of theincreasing number of property damage, personal injuries and deathsdue to car accidents, states put in place legal rules to determinewho is responsible for the damages resulting from a collision.

Car accident law consists of the principles of negligence, which isgoverned almost entirely by state law. There are differences instate laws governing claims or suits seeking damages resulting fromcar accidents, but typically victims must prove the following: (1)presence of duty of care, (2) breach of such duty, (3) the breachcaused personal injuries or property damage, and (4) and the victimincurred monetary losses.

In terms of duty, drivers are legally obligated to obey traffic rulesand drive their vehicles with reasonable standard of care, whichmeans maintaining safe speed, exercising awareness and observingtraffic signals. During litigation, the existence of duty isgenerally accepted without argument. The plaintiff, however, willneed to prove that the drive breached his or her duty. Breach of dutyis proven through direct or circumstantial evidence. Direct evidenceinclude eyewitnesses, testimony, video footages, or admission offault. Circumstantial evidence include skid marks, paint smudges, oralcohol tests.

The plaintiff must further prove that the breach of duty causedinjuries by demonstrating that the injuries are consistent with thenature of the crash and they were not pre-existing. Moreover, theplaintiff needs to prove that the injuries resulted to monetary loss.Once a jury, after trial, determines that the plaintiff has provenall four elements, the plaintiff will be entitled to compensation fordamages, which include medical expenses, pain and grief, lost wages,among others.

Car accident cases are not complex, but litigating claims for damagesarising from property damage, personal injury or death related to caraccidents is tricky and tedious, requiring plaintiffs to confer withcounsel prior to initiating any suit. For the most part of thelitigation, any act or omission by the plaintiff or defendant maylead to either a win for the plaintiff and defeat for the defendant,or defeat for the plaintiff or win for the defendant. What this meansis that, both parties to car accident litigation must beknowledgeable of how the system works, and not just what the lawprovides, in order to win the case.

For instance, car accident litigation is factual, which means,everything that happened before, during and after the accident mustput in record, and every detail must be taken note of, for theplaintiff or the defendant to build a strong case in his or herfavor. Being factual, the plaintiff or defendant must produce bothdirect and circumstantial evidence to prove their case. There arenumerous rules of evidence that must be taken into consideration sothat an evidence will not be thrown out as unacceptable, weakeningthe case. In addition to winning a case for damages, there is alsoanother complicated matter on seeking compensation from the losingparty's insurance. One is not prevented from representing himself incar accident cases. An expert attorney, however, can protect a clientfrom the opponent's tactics.